“At
every crossroads on the path that leads to the future, tradition has placed
10,000 men to guard the past.”
-
Maurice Maeterlinck
Most of us have the great fortune of having friends in this life. We’ve appointed these people as friends and
designate them with different levels of trust.
More often than not, we have something in common with that person; these
common denominators can range from anything such as music and sports to
religion and political beliefs. However,
as much as we would like to believe that hanging out with people of a same
feather is exactly what we need, we couldn’t be further from the truth.
Let’s be clear, I’m not saying that we shouldn’t strive to seek out
others with common denominators; I’m merely saying that diversity offers
perspective. Being able to view the
world through different lenses adds depth to your perception; it truly gives
you an advantage in life. When we do the
same thing over and over again they become habits; habits that evolve into
unshakeable tides of comfort. Realistically,
the majority of the things we know in this life are taught to us when we are
young. Those ideals are then reinforced
by our upbringing and the company we keep.
What if I invited you to challenge everything you know to be true? Would you accept? Or would you rather not, because…well…it’s
safer not to play with these ethereal concepts?
I’m not talking about challenging the small things in our lives; I’m
addressing the large-scaled beliefs that we know to be as foundations of our lives.
Each day, I observe people in their natural setting as they deal with the
day to day challenges of life. One thing
stood out to me; people respect their habits out of fear. The religious types always needed prayer and
sought out a higher being during times of duress. The grudge-holders adamantly stood their
ground when challenged, and regardless of how sensible (and obvious) the
solution was – they never budged. And the
homophobe vehemently denied that happiness, and normalcy, could be attained
solely for the fact that the Bible says “Adam and Eve” and not “Adam and Steve.” So…what happened when I attempted offer
perspective to these individuals? I got
crushed – that’s what happened. Before I
elaborate, please understand that I wasn’t attempting to alter anyone’s
beliefs; I was merely inviting them to peek at the possibilities.
The first person I spoke with was highly against same sex marriage and
relationships (out of respect to those who fulfill this lifestyle, I refuse to
address this as “homosexuality”). The
topic came up in casual conversation and continued through the mode of
debate. I explained that gay people are
every bit as capable and affluent as heterosexual people. I dug up statistics proving that gay people were
very successful and giving to their respective communities and all I got was
resistance. What was the
counter-argument to my statistics you’re wondering? The Bible.
This person was committed to the “fact” that the Bible severely looks
down on that style of life. I say “fact”
because out of the 31,240 total verses in the Bible, we found 2 (less than 0.00006%).
With the dissolution of the homophobe enters the religious
archetype. I’m choosing to withhold my
own religious preferences for the sake of the people who are unaware. I asked this person a seemingly simple
question: “Which religion is the right religion?” Hesitance ensued prior to the answer. I got my answer. I was intrigued by how convinced this person
was in their understanding of the Lord’s word.
I asked them about the interpretation of the bible; and why everyone
interprets it differently. I never
really got a solid answer from that question, but it fueled me to ask about the
existence of God. I wanted to see or
hear about proof of his existence and I didn’t want the source to be the
Bible. Immediate offense was taken
(which I can understand); yet, that wasn’t what caught my eye. This person was furious that I even
questioned His existence; they wouldn’t even entertain the idea of challenging
the premise. I realize how sacrilegious it
was ask a question of that magnitude. I
wasn’t interested in the answer though; the approach and the methodology was
what I wanted.
Finally, I met the person unwilling to relinquish pride. In light speak, I created a scenario in which
the obvious answer would be to push the ego aside and salvage what was important
to them. Regardless, of the
straightforward solution to matter, the “principle of the matter” needed to be
maintained. Ground needed to be stood;
no matter how beneficial a possible change in heart would be - it was never an
option.
Unfortunately
for these types, the world is a swirling torrent of change and progression. Time isn’t necessarily on the side of those
who possess less of an open mind.
Quality of life and overall equality are slowly emerging as the new
standards of our lives. I’m not calling
anyone wrong for not wanting to recognize the world’s change; all I’m inviting
them to do is to take a peek. Be candid
if you must, just don’t completely close your mind out to the possibility of
these alternative realities.
No comments:
Post a Comment